“Mr. Speaker, Alberta is considering several routes for a new diluted bitumen pipeline and export terminals through northern British Columbia, yet the Nisga’a Nation says that neither Alberta nor the federal Liberal government has discussed any oil pipeline proposal with the Nisga’a government. Reconciliation cannot mean making decisions first and talking to first nations later. Will the government commit today to meaningful consultation, accommodation and free, prior and informed consent of affected first nations, and to upholding the north coast oil tanker ban?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 73%Reasoning 27%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 24 wordswhen the proponent has a path, there will be the duty to consult and, if necessary, accommodate.However, there is no project so far, Reasoning · 9 wordsso the duty to consult has not begun yet.
