“Mr. Speaker, there is no question the member is an excellent member of Parliament. We are lucky to have her and so are her constituents. I just want to pick away at this a little. I know she heard the speech earlier from the Liberal member talking about how he felt his government has saved the taxpayer $60 billion. I just do not see that in any of the documents. I do not see that in anything we are discussing today with respect to the opposition day motion. In fact, we are calling out the Liberal government on the fact that its economic policy has failed Canadians. It has failed this country for 11 years. We need a fresh perspective. I wonder if that member can elaborate on the fact that the Liberals seem to be pretty out of touch when they have spent over their $60 billion projected deficit. We are now much higher than that. Somehow these Liberal members are still running around saying that they have saved the taxpayers money when in fact we are seeing record-level deficits.”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 99 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 96%Procedure 4%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 4 wordsthere are no savings.Procedure · 2 wordsIn fact, ProcedureClaims · 43 wordsif we look at the projections going forward, there are even more costs.Even when we look at the spring economic statement or the budget itself, there are hundreds of announcements that they have made that have not been included in those projections.1
