Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Adam Chambers

83 words · 6 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Grant Jackson (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my excellent colleague for his speech, not least for the way that he ended it. I might just have to find myself down there for a couple of butter tarts. His speech accurately portrayed what I am hearing, and what I know most of our colleagues in this place are hearing, from constituents. They are feeling the recession. They are feeling the inflationary policies of the government that have driven down their wages and driven up their cost of living. I would like the member to provide a little more clarity on why he thinks the Liberals cannot admit that their 11 years of inflationary spending have had a devastating impact on our economy, on household incomes and on household debt, and what the implications of that could be going forward.”
Statement grade
A
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Greeting 17%Procedure 10%Claims 36%The question 1%Reasoning 36%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Greeting · 14 wordsthat was a wonderful question from a great colleague and contributor in this chamber.Greeting Procedure · 8 wordsThis is a movie we have seen before.Procedure Claims · 30 wordsThe government was slow and late to acknowledge that inflation was a problem. It is slow and late to the party on the economic decline and stagnation of this country. The question · 1 wordsWhy? Reasoning · 30 wordsIt is because if the Liberals acknowledge there is a problem, because they have been in power for 11 years, well, gosh, maybe they could have done something about it.1

Analysed on