Analysis · Debate question · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

Liberal on Build Canada Homes Act 2026-06-09

118 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

A–

Average 87 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Reasoning 24%Claims 39%Thanks 11%The question 26%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Reasoning · 28 wordsI am sure the minister would agree that it is critically important that we work collaboratively with other jurisdictions, whether it is provinces, indigenous people or other stakeholders. Claims · 33 wordsIt is very clear that the Conservatives made the decision long ago that they do not support Bill C‑20.¹Unearned certainty If it was up to the Conservative Party, Bill C‑20 would never, ever pass. Thanks · 13 wordsThat is why I appreciate what the Minister of Housing is doing today.Thanks The question · 14 wordsGiven the importance of collaboration, I wonder if he can expand upon that point. Claims · 13 wordsHe made reference to the province of Quebec and the benefits of collaboration. The question · 17 wordsCould the minister just expand on that and provide some comments on accountability within the legislation also?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 85

1 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “That is why I appreciate what the Minister of Housing is doing today.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 77

1 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.What the tags mean “It is very clear”The formula asserts certainty in place of a source about the Conservatives’ decision.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the Conservatives made the decision long ago that they do not support Bill C‑20”The Conservative Party does not support Bill C-20, the Build Canada Homes Act.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20