← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 85% The question 15%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 79 words the government granted a visa to a former IRGC commander who arrived at Toronto Pearson airport on April 28 to attend the FIFA World Cup.1 The government also failed to deport an Iranian regime supporter who has been convicted of sanctions violations and has been here so long that he is suing the government.2 The government has said for a year that dozens of senior Iranian officials are here, 3 but exactly one has been deported, 4 as was previously mentioned. The question · 14 words When will the government treat foreign interference threats seriously and protect our Persian community?
At a glance
Nothing lost points.
Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the government granted a visa to a former IRGC commander who arrived at Toronto Pearson airport on April 28 to attend the FIFA World Cup” In June 2026, Michael Chong said the Canadian government granted a visa to a former IRGC commander who arrived at Toronto Pearson airport on April 28, 2026, to attend the FIFA World Cup. search 2 “an Iranian regime supporter who has been convicted of sanctions violations and has been here so long that he is suing the government” An Iranian regime supporter in Canada convicted of sanctions violations has been in the country long enough that he is suing the government, and the speaker said the government failed to deport him. search 3 “The government has said for a year that dozens of senior Iranian officials are here” For about a year before June 2026, the Canadian government had said that dozens of senior Iranian officials were in Canada. search 4 “exactly one has been deported” As of June 2026, exactly one senior Iranian official of the dozens said to be in Canada had been deported. search
