“Mr. Speaker, I know we are talking about Building Canada Homes and creating this stand-alone agency, and the previous speaker mentioned that no homes have actually been built. I was at the inauguration of a building in my riding in March with 30 units for transitional housing, so I have seen in my own riding that we are building. We are building to make sure that we provide the supply to allow more Canadians to find a place to live and to buy their first home. As such, I am not quite sure why the members opposite are saying no homes are being built, when I know for a fact that in my riding there have been. In fact, Longueuil was actually identified as one of the six projects initially announced.”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 96 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 3%Reasoning 62%Claims 35%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 5 wordsI would just suggest this: ProcedureReasoning · 50 wordsMy hon. colleague does not need to take my word for it.She does not need to take the word of my colleagues on this side of the House.Maybe she should go back and look at the Auditor General’s report or the PBO’s report that was tabled last fall.1Claims · 22 wordsIn her report last year, the Auditor General found a clear lack of transparency in reporting numbers on the government’s housing initiatives, 2Reasoning · 16 wordswhich further undermines the trust Canadians have in the government’s ability to address the housing crisis.Claims · 30 wordsUnder its own definition of housing units, the government refuses to be transparent with the kinds of housing it is building and whether it will meet the needs of families.Reasoning · 26 wordsI would remind the member that she needs to also take a look at what others are saying about this crisis and how they are doing.Partly on point
