“Mr. Speaker, the Build Canada Homes bill is not a bad bill because we are in the midst of a housing crisis and any attempt to correct the situation is more than welcome. However, the way the bill is worded, the federal government is encroaching on the jurisdictions of Quebec and the provinces, which always makes me feel a bit uneasy. Quebec and Ottawa made an agreement on a number of things, which should help close loopholes. I would like my colleague to tell me this. In her view, would it not have been better to simply transfer money to the provinces by proposing that they look after housing in each province and in Quebec, according to the priorities and problems that each Canadian province is facing?”
Statement grade
–
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little.
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 100%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 56 wordsthere is no doubt that partnerships between municipalities, provinces and the federal government are important when addressing this issue.Unearned certaintyConservatives believe the goal for these partnerships where housing is concerned should be to reduce the costs and delays that prevent housing from getting built, and to be doing that in partnership with other orders of government.Partly on point
