Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Linda Lapointe

Liberal on Build Canada Homes Act 2026-06-09

70 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Kelly McCauley (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, my colleague from Long Range Mountains asked a very clear question. Canadians deserve a clear answer. I will give the member opposite another chance to answer, please.”

Statement grade

Average 90 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 34%Reasoning 66%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 24 wordsif I understand my colleague’s question correctly, he would like me to provide a more detailed response to the question from my colleague opposite.Procedure Reasoning · 46 wordsObviously, if we want to ensure that Build Canada Homes can build houses, the first step is to vote in favour of the bill so that it can be implemented. Then Build Canada Homes will actually be able to get to work and start building homes.

At a glance

Lost points for
AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 62

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “if I understand my colleague’s question correctly, he would like me to provide a more detailed response to the question from my colleague opposite.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-20