Analysis · Point of order · beta

Xavier Barsalou-Duval

Bloc Québécois on Build Canada Homes Act 2026-06-09

64 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 11%The question 56%Claims 33%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordsI rise on a point of order.Procedure The question · 7 wordsPerhaps you can clarify something for me. Claims · 21 wordsIn my speech earlier, I mentioned the Prime Minister by name because I was simply reading the headline of an article.¹ The question · 29 wordsI would like to know whether, based on precedent, it is permissible to include the name of a member of the House when reading the headline of an article.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 87

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I rise on a point of order.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“I mentioned the Prime Minister by name because I was simply reading the headline of an article”In his speech earlier in the debate on Bill C-20 on June 9, 2026, Xavier Barsalou-Duval mentioned the Prime Minister by name while reading the headline of an article.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20