Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau

8 words · 1 sentences · 1 clauses

Replying to Andréanne Larouche (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, it is true that committee members worked as non-partisanly as possible. In the course of our other proceedings, members of various parties asked questions of the victims and the witnesses who appeared. Incidentally, as part of other studies, we asked people whether Bill C‑16 should be passed. Everyone we heard from asked us to vote in favour of Bill C‑16 and explained to us why it is such a huge step forward. I would like to point out another step forward. During the previous Parliament, the Bloc Québécois introduced a bill to address the impact of the Jordan decision on court delays. Bill C‑16 addresses this issue too. In this case as well, to avoid further delays in the court system, the government must seriously consider providing the provinces and Quebec with additional resources so they can administer this new legislative framework properly. What are my colleague’s thoughts on that?”
Statement grade
–
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 8 wordsagain, this is about implementing and enforcing laws— PositioningPartly on pointSome hon. members: Oh, oh!

Analysed on