Analysis · Reply to a comment · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

147 words · 8 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Mike Lake (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, actually, there are not. This is the Liberals’ bill.”
Statement grade
C+
68 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 41%Claims 54%Procedure 5%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 48 wordsit is really somewhat sad and pathetic that the members opposite have stood up on a point of order twice now. They do not want Canadians to see the silliness that we witness on the floor of the House of Commons coming from the Conservatives. Shame on them.PositioningOff point Claims · 39 wordsAt the end of the day, let us realize that all they did by moving that motion to adjourn was make a couple of statements to Canadians. One is that the Conservatives really do not want to sit late.Partly on point Procedure · 8 wordsThat is what it really comes down to.ProcedureUnearned certainty Positioning · 12 wordsThey are taking us back to their lazy attitudes of the past.PositioningOff point Claims · 40 wordsThe other statement is that while they say they want to debate bills, instead of actually debating the bill, they used the bells to use up the debate time, thereby denying more Conservatives the chance to speak on the legislation— 1Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

Analysed on