Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Steven MacKinnon

90 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Christine Normandin (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, for CUSMA, the Prime Minister’s concessions to the Americans go even further. Through Bill C-5, he has granted himself the power to suspend laws in order to build new pipelines. The big winners are the shareholders of oil companies, 60% of whom are American. Under Bill C-30, he is granting himself the power to re-approve banned pesticides. The big winner is Bayer, which sells Monsanto’s American seeds and pesticides. The Prime Minister is concentrating power in his own hands, but it is the Americans who are benefiting from it. Is that really his definition of Canada strong?”
Statement grade
F
30 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 9%Positioning 91%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 8 wordsI will provide the definition of Canada strong.Procedure Positioning · 82 wordsIt is a Canada that knows how to achieve great things, that knows how to build projects using Quebec and Canadian labour, Canadian materials, Canadian steel and Canadian aluminum.Vague promise It is a society that knows how to dream, that takes charge of its own future, and that creates opportunities for its young people. That is what it means to build Canada strong. Unfortunately, the Bloc Québécois knows nothing about this, has never made decisions on this, and is not involved in this.PositioningOff point

Analysed on