← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 60. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance. 30 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
42 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 53% Claims 47%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 6
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 33 words it would be a little more plausible that the opposition party cared about workers and cared about investment if it did not oppose every investment and every support for workers and for families. Positioning Claims · 42 words The Conservatives oppose dental care.1 They oppose affordable housing.2 They oppose investment in their own communities.3 We invest in Laval Tool and Mould, 4 and they oppose. We invest in Jahn Engineering, 5 and they oppose. We invest in Post Packaging, 6 and they oppose. Positioning · 15 words Instead of opposing support, boosts and investment, they should get on board and start building. Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×11 Positioning ×2 Didn't answer None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked. Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 42
2 of 13 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “it would be a little more plausible that the opposition party cared about workers and cared about investment if it did not oppose every investment and every support for workers and for families.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Instead of opposing support, boosts and investment, they should get on board and start building.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 0
11 of 13 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “it would be a little more plausible that the opposition party cared about workers and cared about investment if it did not oppose every investment and every support for workers and for families.” An attack on the opposition’s record in place of an answer to whether the Prime Minister accepts responsibility.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Conservatives oppose dental care.” About the opposition’s position on dental care, not whether the Prime Minister accepts responsibility.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They oppose affordable housing.” About the opposition’s position on housing, not the question of accepting responsibility.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They oppose investment in their own communities.” About the opposition’s stance on local investment, not the question put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We invest in Laval Tool and Mould,” A claim about government investment in a company, not an answer to the responsibility question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and they oppose.” A further claim about the opposition opposing investments, not the question put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We invest in Jahn Engineering,” Another example of government investment, not an answer to the responsibility question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and they oppose.” A further claim about the opposition opposing investments, not the question put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We invest in Post Packaging,” Another example of government investment, not an answer to the responsibility question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and they oppose.” A further claim about the opposition opposing investments, not the question put.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Instead of opposing support, boosts and investment, they should get on board and start building.” A demand that the opposition change course, not an answer on accepting responsibility.
Respect · 100
0 of 13 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 13 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 6
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “The Conservatives oppose dental care” The Conservative Party opposes dental care. search 2 “They oppose affordable housing” The Conservative Party opposes affordable housing. search 3 “They oppose investment in their own communities” The Conservative Party opposes investment in its own members’ communities. search 4 “We invest in Laval Tool and Mould” The government invests in Laval Tool and Mould. search 5 “We invest in Jahn Engineering” The government invests in Jahn Engineering. search 6 “We invest in Post Packaging” The government invests in Post Packaging. search
