Rob Moore

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 138 wordswhen I was last speaking, I was talking about the irrefutable fact that, since 2015, when the Liberal government took power, we have seen skyrocketing rates of crime.Unearned certainty That is due to some deliberate actions that the government took. I am thinking, specifically, of Bill C-5, ¹which did away with mandatory penalties for serious drug and gun crime and allowed for house arrest for serious offences like arson.²³ It allowed someone to commit a violent crime, even burn down someone’s house, and serve their sentence from the comfort of their own home and in the community where they offended. Bill C-75 was the notorious law that was brought in, ⁴which introduced a principle of restraint that has really tied the hands of our system and forced people out on bail who have no business being out on bail. Procedure · 9 wordsWe have seen the results. What are the results?Procedure Claims · 62 wordsSince 2015, human trafficking has increased by 84%.⁵ Sexual assaults are up by 76%.⁶ Violent crime is up by almost 55%.⁷ My home province of New Brunswick is not immune to this skyrocketing crime. When I speak to my constituents, there are concerns about violent crime, property crime and all manner of crime that people have seen skyrocket, such as drug-related crime. Positioning · 4 wordsThe numbers are staggering.Positioning Claims · 14 wordsThe total number of violent crimes in New Brunswick alone is up over 70%.⁸ Positioning · 52 wordsAs for total violent firearms offences, this is a government that talks a talk on firearms. The problem is that every measure the Liberals take has been completely ineffective because they target law-abiding citizens, the people who I represent in my riding of Fundy Royal, while completely going soft on hardened criminals.Positioning Procedure · 4 wordsWhat is the result?Procedure Claims · 24 wordsViolent firearms offences are up over 150%.⁹ Extortion is up over 300%.¹⁰ Theft of motor vehicle offences are up over 150% since that time.¹¹ Positioning · 9 wordsWhat they have done with the bill is unfortunate.Positioning Claims · 133 wordsThere is something called a mandatory minimum penalty. It is a penalty in the Criminal Code that says that we, as parliamentarians, recognize that, sometimes, an offence is so grave that it should carry with it a certain minimum amount of time in custody. There have been mandatory minimum penalties brought in by previous Liberal governments. There have been mandatory minimum penalties brought in by Conservative governments, and which have been constitutionally upheld, but because the Liberal government is so ideologically opposed to Parliament having its say, listening to our constituents and saying that certain crimes deserve to have a mandatory penalty if someone has committed the offence, the Liberals have introduced in the legislation a clause that would allow judges to ignore the mandatory penalty for someone convicted of these serious crimes.¹² Aside · 37 wordsOne could look up the definition of “mandatory” in Webster’s, but I am pretty sure that allowing someone to ignore a mandatory penalty means it is no longer a mandatory penalty, What is the result of that?Aside Claims · 237 wordsCertain mandatory penalties for offences, many of them considered by the courts and constitutionally upheld, will now be able to be ignored, offences like aggravated sexual assault with a gun, human trafficking, multiple violent firearms offences, extortion with a firearm, weapons trafficking and drive-by shootings with restricted or prohibited firearms.¹³ In the Criminal Code, there is a mandatory penalty for someone convicted of those offences. The bill would allow judges to ignore that mandatory penalty when they are sentencing. I can tell members, having served on the justice committee, that we heard many times about how there has not been a huge increase in the number of criminals in Canada. There has been a very prolific number of criminals who do a great job at what they do. They are committing crimes non-stop because they have a system in which, once they are caught, once the police have done their job and have caught someone, once they have been tried and convicted, they are out on bail, if they are pretrial, and, once convicted, they may be serving their sentence in house arrest. I will sum up by quoting an individual who appeared at our justice committee.¹⁴ She urged members to restore justice to the justice system. As a victim of crime, she said she does not feel we have a justice system anymore in Canada. She feels we have a legal system, not a justice system. The ask · 12 wordsI urge everyone to listen to those words and do our job. Claims · 61 wordsIt is, rightly, the job of parliamentarians to say we are the ones who draft the Criminal Code, set out mandatory penalties and maximum and minimum sentences, and distinguish between different offences. There is a tremendous amount of flexibility in the system when the police have discretion and prosecutors have the discretion on whether to proceed by summary conviction or indictment.¹⁵ Reasoning · 31 wordsAt the end of the day, we, as parliamentarians, are responsible for the safety of our constituents. We must ensure that our actions illustrate this and that we take strong measures.Vague promise Procedure · 14 wordsI would like at this time to move: ¹⁶That the debate be now adjourned.Procedure