Replying to Luc Berthold (Conservative). The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the bill.
“Mr. Speaker, I am a bit perplexed to be rising to speak before the House, given that the parliamentary secretary across the way criticized me just a short while ago for moving to adjourn the debate. However, we are now learning that it was actually the Prime Minister who did so, according to a Radio-Canada article that was just published. Allow me to read an extract: Vacation time has (already) started in Ottawa The members of the House of Commons are on vacation. Mark Carney’s government has announced that— Mr. Speaker, I should have said that the Liberal Prime Minister’s government “has announced that the House has adjourned for the summer”. Can my colleague, who is the critic for institutions, explain to me why we are still debating here in the House when the Liberal Prime Minister has announced that the House has already adjourned for the summer? I am completely baffled. Did he, by any chance, intend to adjourn the House at the end of the day? I would like my colleague to clarify that.”
Statement grade
–
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little.
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 100%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 54 wordswith the greatest respect, I think it underscores the fact that the Prime Minister is AWOL when it comes to this House.InsultIt underscores how disconnected he is from the business of this House and how little attention he pays to the business of this House.Perhaps he should consider showing up for once.PositioningOff point