Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Rebecca Chartrand

Liberal on Indigenous Affairs 2026-06-11

76 words · 5 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Bob Zimmer (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, that was another non-answer. Joseph Murdoch-Flowers, executive director of the Qajuqturvik Community Food Centre in Iqaluit, said this week that the centre has seen its daily meal count go from around 58,000 in 2022 to almost 91,000 last year. It has served 37,000 meals so far this year in a town of 7,500 people. The Liberals have been in power for 11 years, yet 58% of people in Nunavut live in food-insecure households. After 11 years, does the Prime Minister really think Nunavut has never had it so good?”

Statement grade

C+

68 / 100, held down by Clarity

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Reasoning 18%Claims 64%Promise 17%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 14 wordswe know that a food subsidy alone will not solve the food insecurity issue. Claims · 49 wordsThat is why we have been working to engage 124 of the nutrition north communities to ensure that we work with them to find the solutions for their communities.¹Vague promise What we are working toward is moving from a food subsidy to a food economy.Vague promise That means a whole-of-government approach. Promise · 13 wordsI continue looking forward to working with the member opposite to find solutions.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
VagueMuch of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 7 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 45

5 of 7 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “we know that a food subsidy alone will not solve the food insecurity issue.”It is about food insecurity and subsidies but does not give an answer to whether Nunavut has never had it so good.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “That is why we have been working to engage 124 of the nutrition north communities to ensure that we work with them to find the solutions for their communities.”It describes engagement with nutrition north communities on the issue without addressing the question asked.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “What we are working toward is moving from a food subsidy to a food economy.”It outlines the government’s own approach to food insecurity without answering the question asked.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “That means a whole-of-government approach.”It adds a general description of the approach without addressing what was asked.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “I continue looking forward to working with the member opposite to find solutions.”On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.

Respect · 100

0 of 7 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 38

2 of 7 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we have been working to engage”No date, measure or success condition is given for this engagement, only that it is happening.
A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “What we are working toward”The shift to a food economy is named as a goal with no actor, date or measure attached.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“we have been working to engage 124 of the nutrition north communities”The government has been working to engage 124 of the Nutrition North communities to find solutions for those communities.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20