Analysis · Debate question · beta

Harb Gill

Conservative on Strong and Free Elections Act 2026-06-11

103 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

Average 93 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 52%The question 40%Positioning 8%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 39 wordsafter a decade of Liberal government scandals, foreign interference concerns and loss of public trust, the government wants Parliament to rush through the bill and change the rules governing federal elections.¹ This process deprives Canadians of a fulsome debate. The question · 18 wordsWhy is the government focused on rewriting election laws instead of rebuilding the trust that Canadians have lost? Claims · 8 wordsThey need trust brought back to democratic institutions.Hidden agency Positioning · 8 wordsThat is not what the Liberals are doing.Positioning Claims · 7 wordsThey have spent years undermining that trust. The question · 23 wordsWhy do they not work on affordability, crime prevention and economic growth so Canadians can once again trust what their government is doing?

At a glance

Lost points for
Echo ×13“After more than a decade of Liberal government.” Said 13 times by 11 members.Every time it was said

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 90

1 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “That is not what the Liberals are doing.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 90

1 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Wording that hides who did something, or who will.What the tags mean “trust brought back to democratic institutions”The passive names no actor for restoring trust, leaving who would do it unstated.

Echo · 1 repeated line

Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.

“After more than a decade of Liberal government.”Said 13 times by 11 members.Every time it was said

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the government wants Parliament to rush through the bill”The government moved time allocation limiting third reading debate on Bill C-25 to five further hours.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20