Abdelhaq Sari

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordsI am speaking today about Bill C-267.Procedure Anecdote · 61 wordsSomeone’s refrigerator breaks down. They call a technician, who says that the part is no longer available, that the repair manual is missing or was never available and that the cost of the repair exceeds the price of a new appliance. That person is then forced to spend $500, $1,000, or even more, to replace something that should have been repaired.Anecdote Positioning · 5 wordsThis is not bad luck.Positioning Claims · 221 wordsIt is a business model. It is called planned obsolescence. These appliances are deliberately designed not to last and not to be repairable in order to force people to repair them. This model costs Canadian families dearly every year. The solution is a collaborative national framework. That is what Bill C-267 proposes: a response that is both simple and ambitious—a national framework for sustainable and repairable electronic products and essential devices. It is not a rigid regulation; it is not an encroachment on provincial jurisdictions. It is a flexible framework developed in collaboration with the regions, the provinces, industry and consumer advocacy groups that would finally give Canadians the right to know, the right to choose and the right to repair. In practical terms, the bill sets minimal durability standards and requires the availability of spare parts, technical documentation for independent repair persons, and clear labelling so that consumers know what they are sinking their money into before they spend it. Through this bill, Canada is simply catching up with the rest of the world. The European Union introduced a right to repair directive in 2024.¹ The United Kingdom passed its legislation back in 2021.² In the U.S., over twenty states have taken action with bipartisan support.³ Apple, Samsung, LG and Whirlpool are already adapting these standards to their other markets.⁴ Reasoning · 17 wordsThis means a minimal burden for Canada. The benefit for families will be substantial, tangible and real. Procedure · 8 wordsWe may wonder who is going to benefit.Procedure Claims · 61 wordsFirst, Canadian families that cannot afford to replace everything once a year will benefit; the repair shops that my colleagues mentioned earlier will benefit; local SMEs, often run by tradespeople and immigrants who are currently denied access by manufacturers to the parts and information they need to perform repairs will benefit. Most of all, the environment and our planet will benefit, Reasoning · 17 wordsbecause each appliance repaired rather than discarded represents a resource conserved and one less piece of trash. Claims · 30 wordsRepair is an integral part of Quebec and Canadian culture. I know several associations and groups in Bourassa, Montreal and elsewhere in Quebec that help people with their repair projects. Procedure · 18 wordsToday I would like to talk about the community of activists and volunteers who help people with repairs.Procedure Claims · 35 wordsOne example is Wai Chu Cheng in the riding of Taiaiako’n—Parkdale—High Park: ⁵She is the co-founder of Repair Café in Toronto, Ontario.⁶ This culture is not confined to Quebec or Alberta; it is across Canada. The ask · 18 wordsIn closing, I am reaching out to my colleagues from all parties, all regions and from every province. Claims · 6 wordsThis is not a partisan bill. Positioning · 5 wordsIt is a sensible bill.Positioning Claims · 63 wordsIt makes a lot of sense because it provides that things can be repaired instead of merely replaced, that we can be informed instead of being unaware, and that we can work together instead of imposing anything. I think of the families in Bourassa and across the country who are watching what we do here today. The bill is not a partisan project. Positioning · 28 wordsIt is a promise to every household that deserves better: to repair, not replace, to inform, not ignore, and to collaborate, not oppose. That is what I believe, PositioningThe ask · 18 wordsand that is what I ask the House to stand for. Let us refer this bill to committee, Reasoning · 12 wordswhere we can improve it together, hear from witnesses and strengthen it. Positioning · 6 wordsThat is what Canadian families deserve, PositioningClaims · 7 wordsand that is what this bill delivers.