← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 86 / 100
Signal
67 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
91 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 66% Positioning 17% Procedure 11% Reasoning 6%
Structure · 13 steps
Claims · 6
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 11 words we may well be the only G20 country in a recession.6 Positioning · 13 words Why? It is because the Liberals are throwing taxpayers’ money out the window. Positioning Claims · 36 words The Prime Minister spent nearly $1 million on meals for just 14 flights in a single year.1 The fact is that from May 16 to 19, 2025, from Ottawa to Rome, he spent $93,780 on food.2 Procedure · 4 words That is a fact. Procedure Claims · 18 words From November 18 to 24, 2025, from Ottawa to Athens via Johannesburg, he spent on $159,781 on food.3 Procedure · 4 words That is another fact. Procedure Claims · 15 words From January 5 to 7, 2026, from Ottawa to Paris, he spent $74,000 on food.4 Procedure · 4 words That is another fact. Procedure Claims · 16 words From January 13 to 22, 2026, from Ottawa to Zurich, he spent $175,248 on fine dining.5 Procedure · 4 words That is another fact. Procedure Reasoning · 9 words Clearly, the problem is not a lack of money. Unearned certainty Positioning · 11 words The problem is a lack of respect and accountability toward Canadians. Positioning
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure ×4 Positioning ×3 Unearned certainty
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 67
7 of 8 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Why?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is because the Liberals are throwing taxpayers’ money out the window.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “That is a fact.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “That is another fact.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “That is another fact.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “That is another fact.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The problem is a lack of respect and accountability toward Canadians.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 8 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 91
1 of 8 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “Clearly, the problem is not a lack of money” The word “Clearly” asserts the conclusion in place of any source or evidence.
Claims · 6
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “spent nearly $1 million on meals for just 14 flights in a single year” The Prime Minister spent nearly $1 million on meals for 14 flights in a single year. search 2 “from May 16 to 19, 2025, from Ottawa to Rome, he spent $93,780 on food” The Prime Minister spent $93,780 on food during a trip from Ottawa to Rome from May 16 to 19, 2025. search 3 “From November 18 to 24, 2025, from Ottawa to Athens via Johannesburg, he spent on $159,781 on food” The Prime Minister spent $159,781 on food during a trip from Ottawa to Athens via Johannesburg from November 18 to 24, 2025. search 4 “From January 5 to 7, 2026, from Ottawa to Paris, he spent $74,000 on food” The Prime Minister spent $74,000 on food during a trip from Ottawa to Paris from January 5 to 7, 2026. search 5 “From January 13 to 22, 2026, from Ottawa to Zurich, he spent $175,248 on fine dining” The Prime Minister spent $175,248 on dining during a trip from Ottawa to Zurich from January 13 to 22, 2026. search 6 “we may well be the only G20 country in a recession” Canada is the only G20 country in a recession. search
