← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity.
Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 79% The question 21%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 62 words U.S. prosecutors have linked the U.S. consulate and synagogue shootings to an IRGC terrorist network.1 In 2023, Global News reported that upward of 700 regime‑linked associates could be operating in Canada.2 A year ago, the government said that nearly 30 Iranian regime operatives who were here in Canada should be deported.3 Since then, reports have indicated that only one has been deported.4 The question · 16 words Can the government confirm if more than one individual has been deported in the last year?
At a glance
Nothing lost points.
Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “U.S. prosecutors have linked the U.S. consulate and synagogue shootings to an IRGC terrorist network.” U.S. prosecutors have linked the U.S. consulate and synagogue shootings to an IRGC terrorist network. search
2 “upward of 700 regime‑linked associates could be operating in Canada” Global News reported in 2023 that upward of 700 Iranian regime-linked associates could be operating in Canada. search
3 “the government said that nearly 30 Iranian regime operatives who were here in Canada should be deported” Around June 2025 the Canadian government said nearly 30 Iranian regime operatives in Canada should be deported. search
4 “only one has been deported” Reports indicate that of the nearly 30 Iranian regime operatives the government said in 2025 should be deported, only one has been deported. search