← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity. Average 94 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
75 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 47% Reasoning 46% The question 6%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 44 words this government is showing a lack of empathy for seniors and community organizations with its hasty reform of the New Horizons for Seniors program. Its attitude is jeopardizing hundreds of projects that break seniors’ isolation and encourage them to have an active social life.1 Reasoning · 43 words The federal government should be thanking the volunteers who dedicate their time and effort to these projects, not treating them like potential fraudsters. No reason given All these organizations want is for the government to delay its reform to ensure that seniors are not left behind. The question · 6 words Will the government delay the reform?
At a glance
Lost points for No reason given
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 75
1 of 1 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “The federal government should be thanking the volunteers who dedicate their time and effort to these projects, not treating them like potential fraudsters.” Nothing in the statement describes the government treating volunteers as fraudsters; the claim stands alone.
Conclusions found · 4
Conclusion “this government is showing a lack of empathy for seniors and community organizations with its hasty reform of the New Horizons for Seniors program.”
Because “Its attitude is jeopardizing hundreds of projects that break seniors’ isolation and encourage them to have an active social life.”
Conclusion “Its attitude is jeopardizing hundreds of projects that break seniors’ isolation and encourage them to have an active social life.”
Because “this government is showing a lack of empathy for seniors and community organizations with its hasty reform of the New Horizons for Seniors program.”
Conclusion “The federal government should be thanking the volunteers who dedicate their time and effort to these projects, not treating them like potential fraudsters.”
Because No reason given
No reason given Nothing in the statement describes the government treating volunteers as fraudsters; the claim stands alone.
Conclusion “All these organizations want is for the government to delay its reform to ensure that seniors are not left behind.”
Because “Its attitude is jeopardizing hundreds of projects that break seniors’ isolation and encourage them to have an active social life.”
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “hundreds of projects that break seniors’ isolation” Hundreds of projects funded under the New Horizons for Seniors program that help counter seniors’ isolation are being jeopardized by the government’s reform of the program. search
