Analysis · Debate question · beta

Tamara Kronis

Conservative on Government Business No. 12—Proceedings on Bill C-30 2026-06-15

155 words · 6 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 80%Reasoning 6%The question 14%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 117 wordsI had the privilege of being at the finance committee over the last week or so for a number of the hours the member is speaking about, and I can say that it has not been about filibustering. It has been about asking questions in the only venue that has been made available to us to examine this bill. I have received many emails, phone calls and comments from constituents who are concerned about some of the things that the member for Saanich—Gulf Islands talked about, such as the pesticide clauses and other changes that are happening to a wide variety of bills.¹ For a bill that would touch so many acts, 30 hours is not enough. Reasoning · 10 wordsWe need to be able to examine this bill properly. The question · 21 wordsI am wondering why the government is determined to ram things through without adequate consultation and risk unintended consequences of bills, Claims · 7 wordsas we have seen with Bill C-30.

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the pesticide clauses”Bill C-30 includes clauses concerning pesticides (amendments to the Pest Control Products Act).search

Analysed on 2026-10-20