← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 68. The grade is held to 59, 30 above Relevance.
59 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
45 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
29 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 50% Claims 50%
Structure · 10 steps
Claims · 4
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 20 words instead of tearing down this country, which the Conservatives do, or counting airline miles, they should help build it up. Positioning Off point Claims · 12 words The May jobs report showed that Canada created 88,000 new net jobs.1 Positioning · 4 words Do they mention that? Positioning Claims · 7 words No. Our trade surplus is up 55%.2 Positioning · 4 words Do they mention it? Positioning Claims · 9 words No. Our total exports are at a record high.3 Positioning · 4 words Do they mention it? Positioning Claims · 17 words No. When we have a groceries and essentials benefit to help Canadians, do they vote for it?4 Partly on point Positioning · 13 words No. Why do they not get on board and help build up Canada? Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×7 Partly on point ×7 Off point ×4
Didn't answer None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 45
7 of 18 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “instead of tearing down this country,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “which the Conservatives do,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “or counting airline miles, they should help build it up.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Do they mention that?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Do they mention it?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Do they mention it?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “No. Why do they not get on board and help build up Canada?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 29
11 of 18 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “instead of tearing down this country,” An attack on the Conservatives in place of an answer to whether the policies will be reversed.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which the Conservatives do,” An attack on the opposition, not the reversal asked about.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “or counting airline miles, they should help build it up.” An attack on the questioner’s side rather than the decision asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The May jobs report showed that Canada created 88,000 new net jobs.” A jobs statistic on the economy, not whether the policies in question will be reversed.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Do they mention that?” A rhetorical aside tied to other statistics, not the reversal asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “No. Our trade surplus is up 55%.” A trade statistic offered in place of an answer on reversing the policies.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Do they mention it?” A rhetorical aside tied to other statistics, not the decision asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “No. Our total exports are at a record high.” An export statistic on the economy, not the reversal asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Do they mention it?” A rhetorical aside tied to other statistics, not the decision asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “No. When we have a groceries and essentials benefit to help Canadians, do they vote for it?” About a government benefit and opposition votes, not whether the policies asked about will be reversed.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “No. Why do they not get on board and help build up Canada?” A demand that the opposition act instead of answering the question put.
Respect · 100
0 of 18 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 18 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 4
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “The May jobs report showed that Canada created 88,000 new net jobs” Canada’s May 2026 jobs report showed 88,000 new net jobs created. search
2 “Our trade surplus is up 55%” Canada’s trade surplus rose by 55%. search
3 “Our total exports are at a record high” Canada’s total exports are at a record high. search
4 “When we have a groceries and essentials benefit to help Canadians, do they vote for it?” The Conservatives voted against the government’s groceries and essentials benefit. search