Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Vincent Ho

81 words · 6 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to John-Paul Danko (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, I want to point out that there is a difference between good faith, constructive criticism and whatever it is the member does on a regular basis. Everything is a conspiracy and everything is division, fear, anger and hyperbolic nonsense. Frankly, it is sad and it is embarrassing. Would the member acknowledge that Canada is not broken and that, in fact, our government is doing exactly what it was elected to do?”
Statement grade
A
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 20%Procedure 7%Claims 54%The question 19%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 11 wordswhat is embarrassing is the Liberals’ record. What have they done?Positioning Procedure · 6 wordsLet us look at their record.Procedure Positioning · 5 wordsThe macroeconomic results are devastating.Positioning Claims · 44 wordsWe have the highest household debt in the G7, the most unaffordable housing in the G7, the lowest investment per worker in the G7, the second-lowest productivity in the G7, the second-highest unemployment in the G7 and the worst food inflation in the G7.123456 The question · 15 wordsWas that the promise my Liberal colleague made to his constituents in the election campaign?

Analysed on