Analysis · Debate question · beta

Tamara Kronis

Conservative on Combatting Hate Act 2026-06-15

150 words · 5 sentences · 6 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 86%The question 14%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 129 wordsI have lost track of the number of times I have risen just this week to talk about why the government’s inability to plan a legislative agenda should not become an emergency in the House. This is yet another move toward time allocation.¹ I want to remind everyone in the House that the rush the Liberals did with Bill C-3, when they rammed it through the House and undid the amendments that were done at committee, showing a disrespect for the committee process, led to unintended consequences, creating a large document backlog, confusion for families and a very broad path to citizenship for people with a limited connection to Canada.² I see another bill and another set of unintended consequences, and we have gotten so much mail about this. The question · 21 wordsI would like the member to explain yet again why we cannot take the time to properly consider this important legislation.

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“yet another move toward time allocation”The government moved a time allocation motion on Bill C-9 on June 15, 2026.search
2“undid the amendments that were done at committee”The House undid the committee amendments when it passed Bill C-3.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20