“Mr. Speaker, I have lost track of the number of times I have risen just this week to talk about why the government’s inability to plan a legislative agenda should not become an emergency in the House. This is yet another move toward time allocation. I want to remind everyone in the House that the rush the Liberals did with Bill C-3, when they rammed it through the House and undid the amendments that were done at committee, showing a disrespect for the committee process, led to unintended consequences, creating a large document backlog, confusion for families and a very broad path to citizenship for people with a limited connection to Canada. I see another bill and another set of unintended consequences, and we have gotten so much mail about this. I would like the member to explain yet again why we cannot take the time to properly consider this important legislation.”
Statement grade
A–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 90. The grade is held to 89, 30 above Relevance.
89 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 100%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 105 wordsthis legislation has been considered in the House.1It has been considered in the other place.2Amendments have been made in both Houses of Parliament, 3and the bill has come back for genuine debate.I know the Conservative Party of Canada has been busy for many months spreading a misinformation campaign, so we have been getting a lot of calls from people thinking stuff is in the bill that is not.Off pointIt is a short bill.It is very targeted, and it is in compliance of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.It would not limit anyone’s ability to practise their faith in this country.
