“Mr. Speaker, it is a privilege to rise on behalf of the residents of Oshawa. I would like to start my question by mentioning my father. Today would have been his 85th birthday. He passed away four years ago, just 10 and a half months after my mom passed away. When I was a teenager, there was a lot of talk about hate speech and hate crimes and defining them. I remember him saying to me, at that time, to watch carefully because this will turn into something else as time progresses. What it will turn into is that, one day, our government will say that a certain piece of scripture or religious text will be deemed hate speech or a hate crime. That is a real concern for me. Why should Canadians trust these guys not to do exactly that and imprison people for speaking their religious truth?”
Statement grade
D
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 65. The grade is held to 48, 30 above Relevance.
48 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 45%Positioning 55%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 19 wordsthis is exactly the misinformation that I have been speaking about tonight.That is not what the bill does.Positioning · 40 wordsI would say that I think Canadians would mistrust the current Conservative Party of Canada right now because Conservatives talk about being tough on crime and they talk about making Canada safe, but their actions have not been showing it.PositioningClaims · 25 wordsJust last week, they voted against making femicide a first-degree murder charge.1They voted against longer sentences for child predators.2They voted against minimum penalties.3Positioning · 13 wordsWho are these Conservatives and why are they against safety and protecting Canadians?PositioningOff point
