Analysis · Debate question · beta

Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba

56 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Following a speech by Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Madam Speaker, absolutely. I wish I would be given the time to give a full answer on it. When people go to the voting booth, they exercise their vote, and the names of the local candidates are on the ballot. However, to deny the fact that people vote for the leader of political parties, the party itself and the local candidate is to deny reality. At the end of the day, people contrasted our Prime Minister to the leader of the official opposition and others. Ultimately, the support garnered for the leader helped a lot of Liberal candidates get elected in the last federal election. With respect to time allocation, I can say to my friend opposite that Peter Van Loan, who sat two desks ahead of me, would do the same sort of thing. He brought time allocation over 100 times in the last few years of the Harper government.”
Statement grade
A
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 43%Claims 29%The question 29%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Reasoning · 24 wordsI would like to add to that because I do not believe that anyone is opposed to peace, which is the opposite of hatred. Claims · 16 wordsThis bill will help us build a new Canada that is fundamentally committed to promoting peace.Vague promise The question · 16 wordsCould my colleague offer his comments and explain why the opposition continues to fight this bill?

Analysed on