Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Roman Baber

Conservative on Combatting Hate Act 2026-06-16

36 words · 2 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Chris Lewis (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, it is— Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Mr. Speaker, it is an awfully heavy day in the House today, when we are supposed to collectively be trying to bring peace and unity not only to Canada, but to the world. Hearing the heckling toward my hon. colleague is pretty darn embarrassing. Equally, though, I am darn proud of the member for standing up for what is right. What is not in the bill, or what is totally missing? What needs to be put in the bill to ensure that people are safe?”

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 36 wordsit was brought in as an amendment to this very bill.² The member for Mount Royal wanted to amend Bill C‑9 to criminalize the wilful promotion of terrorism, ¹but the government would not allow him to.³

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“The member for Mount Royal wanted to amend Bill C‑9 to criminalize the wilful promotion of terrorism”The member for Mount Royal proposed an amendment to Bill C-9 to criminalize the wilful promotion of terrorism.search
2“it was brought in as an amendment to this very bill”An amendment was introduced to Bill C-9.search
3“the government would not allow him to”The government prevented the member for Mount Royal from adding the amendment to Bill C-9.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20