Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Harb Gill

55 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Mario Beaulieu (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, my colleague said that the laws already exist and that they need to be enforced. At least one area does require a legislative amendment, specifically the religious exemption for incitement to hatred. Under that exemption, anyone who quotes a passage from the Bible or the Quran to incite hatred will be protected and cannot be prosecuted. Does my colleague agree that a legislative amendment is needed in that regard?”
Statement grade
A+
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 78%Reasoning 22%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Claims · 43 wordsThat is incorrect, Mr. Speaker. The legislation already exists. If anybody, regardless of what text they use, is inciting violence against any Canadian, or non‑Canadian for that matter, that is already an offence and we have the tools necessary to lay those charges.1 Reasoning · 12 wordsAs I said, we just need the courage to lay those charges.

Analysed on