Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Amanpreet Gill

Conservative on Combatting Hate Act 2026-06-16

39 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Grant Jackson (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, I find it very unfortunate that the member for Winnipeg North would accuse this member of the things that he has put on the record today. I think that is a pretty disturbing accusation to put on the record. I think the member for Calgary Skyview is accurately representing the concerns that he has heard from his own constituents as well as his own ethnic community. I wonder if the member could put on the record a bit more of the things that he has heard from leaders of his faith, which the member for Winnipeg North should probably take heed of before we take a final vote on the bill.”

Statement grade

78 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 26%Reasoning 64%Positioning 10%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 10 wordsI absolutely believe in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Reasoning · 13 wordsIn fact, that is why we are raising these concerns and presenting amendments. Positioning · 4 wordsWe have the solution.PositioningVague promise Reasoning · 12 wordsThe Liberals can adopt it, and the country would be more united.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 88

1 of 7 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “We have the solution.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 48

5 of 7 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “I absolutely believe in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”States a belief in the Charter, not what faith leaders said.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “In fact, that is why we are raising these concerns and presenting amendments.”Speaks of raising concerns and presenting amendments, not the things heard from faith leaders.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We have the solution.”Asserts having a solution, but does not report what faith leaders said.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “The Liberals can adopt it,”Calls on the Liberals to adopt the solution, not the content of faith leaders’ concerns.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “and the country would be more united.”Predicts the country would be more united, without saying what faith leaders said.

Respect · 100

0 of 7 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 88

1 of 7 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “We have the solution”The speaker claims a solution without naming any measure, actor, or test of what it would do.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-20