Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Amanpreet Gill

Conservative on Combatting Hate Act 2026-06-16

58 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Mario Beaulieu (Bloc Québécois)

“Mr. Speaker, does my colleague agree that religious texts should never be deliberately used to incite hatred against a particular group? If so, why not abolish the existing religious exemption in the Criminal Code for this type of offence?”

Statement grade

Average 91 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Thanks 12%Claims 19%Reasoning 52%The ask 17%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 7 wordsI respect the member from the Bloc.Thanks Claims · 11 wordsConservatives condemn those kinds of actions and those kinds of attacks.Partly on point Reasoning · 30 wordsIf the Bloc asks why safeguards do not give us insurance, the exemption clause provides the safeguard Canadians deserve instead of trying to add more small fixes in fine print. The ask · 10 wordsI would ask members of the Bloc to support us.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 86

1 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “I respect the member from the Bloc.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 77

2 of 3 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “Conservatives condemn those kinds of actions and those kinds of attacks.”About condemning actions in the earlier exchange, not the exemption question put to him.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “I would ask members of the Bloc to support us.”An appeal to vote with the Conservatives, giving no answer on the exemption asked about.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-20