← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 49% Reasoning 36% The question 15%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 16 words Canada’s independent Information Commissioner said she was disappointed with the Liberal changes to access to information.1 Reasoning · 20 words Disappointed is an understatement, considering that yesterday, the President of the Treasury Board could not even respond to the question, 2 Claims · 11 words and last week, he could not even find the right page.3 The question · 8 words Will he rescind the changes, yes or no?
At a glance
Nothing lost points.
Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · no score
No score: nothing is concluded. Excluded from the average.
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Conclusions found · 0
None: nothing is concluded.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Canada’s independent Information Commissioner said she was disappointed with the Liberal changes to access to information” Canada’s Information Commissioner said she was disappointed with the Liberal government’s changes to access to information. search 2 “yesterday, the President of the Treasury Board could not even respond to the question” On 2026-06-15 in the House, the President of the Treasury Board did not respond to a question about rescinding the access to information changes. search 3 “last week, he could not even find the right page” In the week of June 8-12, 2026 in the House, the President of the Treasury Board could not find the right page when asked about the access to information changes. search
