Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Patty Hajdu

Liberal on Persons with Disabilities 2026-06-16

63 words · 3 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Tamara Kronis (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, I suppose it is useful to know that instead of reports, we are going to get consultations. Maybe we will get an answer to the next question. CPP disability applications are supposed to be decided within 120 days, 80% of the time. Last year, the Liberals managed only 49.3%, less than half. Why are disabled Canadians being left for months without income while the minister misses her own deadline?”

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 68%Promise 32%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 43 wordswe work diligently to make sure that Canadians get the benefits to which they are entitled.Vague promise Indeed, the focus of the department is to ensure that Canadians have access to those benefits and supports when they are challenged in applying for those benefits.Positioning Promise · 20 wordsWe will continue that hard work together to make sure every Canadian gets the benefits to which they are entitled.Partly on pointVague promise

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 30

2 of 7 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “we work diligently to make sure that Canadians get the benefits to which they are entitled.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Indeed, the focus of the department is to ensure that Canadians have access to those benefits and supports when they are challenged in applying for those benefits.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 46

3 of 7 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “we work diligently to make sure that Canadians get the benefits to which they are entitled.”A general assurance about diligent work on benefits, not addressing the missed processing standard or the delay in income.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “Indeed, the focus of the department is to ensure that Canadians have access to those benefits and supports when they are challenged in applying for those benefits.”About the department’s focus on helping applicants access benefits, not why the deadline was missed.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We will continue that hard work together to make sure every Canadian gets the benefits to which they are entitled.”A restatement of continued effort on benefits generally, without addressing the processing failures raised.

Respect · 100

0 of 7 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 40

2 of 7 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we work diligently to make sure that Canadians get the benefits”The speaker asserts her side’s effort with no measure, date or success condition named.
A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “We will continue that hard work”A commitment to continue working with no actor-specific action, date or measure attached.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-20