Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Jacob Mantle

Conservative on Public Safety 2026-06-16

100 words · 9 sentences · 11 clauses

Statement grade

Average 91 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 20%Claims 41%Reasoning 14%The ask 20%The question 5%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 20 wordsit was all fake, all an illusion. Liberal promises to work together on Bill C-22 were hollow from the start.Positioning Claims · 41 wordsThe Liberals will ram through the largest government surveillance operation in a generation. The Minister of Public Safety promised better. He promised he would work collaboratively, promised he would listen and promised he would take amendments.¹ He is breaking those promises. Reasoning · 14 wordsPolice need the tools to catch the bad guys in a digital era, obviously. The ask · 20 wordsThat is why we proposed a solid compromise: pass the uncontroversial parts of the bill, and continue debating the others. The question · 5 wordsWill they take that offer?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 74

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “it was all fake, all an illusion.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Liberal promises to work together on Bill C-22 were hollow from the start.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“promised he would work collaboratively, promised he would listen and promised he would take amendments”The Minister of Public Safety said in the House that he would work collaboratively on Bill C-22, listen, and take amendments.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20