Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Evan Solomon

Liberal on Grocery Industry 2026-06-16

101 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Don Davies (NDP)

“Mr. Speaker, New Democrats have raised the alarm on surveillance pricing, an invasive and unfair scheme that gouges Canadians. We called on the Liberals to follow the Manitoba NDP government, which moved swiftly to ban this insidious practice. Instead, the government tabled legislation that not only fails to address this issue, but does not even mention it. I guess AI for everyone really means everyone is a target. Why are the Liberals refusing to protect Canadians from abusive technology that invades their privacy and enables discriminatory pricing?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 101 wordswe are very proud to have tabled legislation that would protect children, privacy and personal information and give us the opportunity to finally act against surveillance pricing and price gouging, making sure that Canadians have an affordable life.¹ We are doing that with a regulator that will enforce that.² This practice has been praised by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, ³which said it is very pleased that this represents “a pivotal step for privacy in Canada” and “I welcome the proposals to recognize privacy as a fundamental right, an explicit recognition of the best interests of children, requirements to conduct—⁴⁵

At a glance

AnsweredOf this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 5

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“have tabled legislation that would protect children, privacy and personal information and give us the opportunity to finally act against surveillance pricing and price gouging”The government has tabled legislation that would protect children, privacy and personal information and act against surveillance pricing and price gouging.search
2“a regulator that will enforce that”The tabled legislation would be enforced by a regulator.search
3“This practice has been praised by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner”The Office of the Privacy Commissioner has praised the government’s privacy legislation.search
4“a pivotal step for privacy in Canada”The Office of the Privacy Commissioner said the legislation represents ‘a pivotal step for privacy in Canada’.search
5“I welcome the proposals to recognize privacy as a fundamental right, an explicit recognition of the best interests of children, requirements to conduct”The Privacy Commissioner said he welcomed proposals in the legislation to recognize privacy as a fundamental right, explicitly recognize the best interests of children, and require something (the quote is cut off mid-list).search

Analysed on 2026-10-20