Anthony Housefather

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 11 wordsI will be sharing my time with the member for Saint‑Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton.Procedure Claims · 31 wordsThe combatting hate act has been before this House for nine months.¹ During those nine months, we have had extensive debate in this place, in the other place and at committee. Positioning · 4 wordsThis bill is important.Positioning Procedure · 34 wordsI want to take members back to what started the process of amending our hate laws in a way that is broader than the way they have been amended in the last 30 years.Procedure Claims · 605 wordsIn the spring of 2024, in my own riding of Mount Royal, the Jewish community centre, the Montreal Holocaust Museum and The Jewish Public Library were surrounded by demonstrators.² They were surrounded by demonstrators yelling hateful things. They were surrounded by demonstrators carrying signs, some of which supported terrorist organizations. However, the police failed to arrest people. They failed to stop what was a demonstration that descended into illegality. They said at the time that they did not have clear enough instructions or clear enough rules related to when a demonstration outside of a community centre, a school, a temple, a church or a synagogue has crossed the line.³ The combatting hate act makes clear that these buildings deserve special protection. It creates new intimidation and obstruction offences related to protests outside of community centres, places of worship and schools that make it clear that these buildings deserve special protection. It makes it clear that a person cannot intimidate someone from entering that building to hear a speaker they want to hear, to worship as they want to worship or to attend their classes. It makes it clear that a person cannot obstruct people from entering or leaving the building, which is what happened that night in March 2024. At the time, I called for this change to the criminal law. I said that, because the police told me that they were unable to take action, the Parliament of Canada has a duty to act, to rewrite existing criminal laws so that they are clearer and so they provide more tools to police officers. The same thing happened with respect to Mr. Charkaoui. He said things that were absolutely hateful in the streets of Montreal, ⁴but the prosecutors did not take action. We ended up in a situation where the House set up a committee. I asked for the justice and human rights committee to study anti-Semitism. We did, and in December 2024, we put out a unanimous report, on most issues.⁵ Yes, there was dissent, but the dissent was not on the vast majority of issues, including the intimidation and obstruction offence. However, that has not stopped what the Prime Minister called the “crisis of anti-Semitism” that has overwhelmed the western world, including Canada, ⁶where over 70% of religious-based hate offences are against the Jewish community, ⁷which makes up 1.2% of the population, ⁸and where a Jewish Canadian has a 19 times greater chance of having a hate crime committed against them than the average Canadian.⁹ I want to point out that two weeks ago there was an attempted arson attack on a temple in Westmount, Temple Emanu‑El, ¹⁰where I joined the Minister of Canadian Identity, former senator Marc Gold, and the Secretary of State for Youth to support the community at services.¹¹ This law has a stand-alone hate provision, which can be used alongside the arson charges that gentleman will face, to make sure the person who is charged will face more jail time than previously. We also have provisions in this bill to say that when people fly terrorist symbols, the Nazi hakenkreuz or the SS bolt, ¹²or now the noose, which was added by the Senate in its recent amendment, in a way that inspires hate against a community, they would now easily be charged by the police.¹³ The bill offers greater protection for minority communities across this country, and for majority communities, by the way. It offers greater protections to Christians as well, who are a majority. It delivers protections to all religious faiths. It delivers protections to the LGBTQ+ community, the indigenous communities and other communities that face hate. Positioning · 13 wordsWhy would anyone be against it? Why would anyone be against this bill?Positioning Claims · 34 wordsThe only argument I have heard to date against this bill, the number one reason I have heard, is that the law is not being enforced and we should just enforce the existing law, Reasoning · 95 wordsas if the federal government was responsible for the enforcement of the Criminal Code. This is something that is in the hands of the provinces. The decisions on whether to charge people are made by local municipal police, in most cases, and provincial prosecutors, not the federal government.¹⁴ The argument that we should not give police the tools they say they need to prosecute these crimes, because we should just tell them to do what they are supposed to do, does not wash, because it is essentially saying that the federal government should do nothing. Claims · 38 wordsWe have the ability to write the Criminal Code, and we are doing so. With this bill, when it is enacted, and with the new bail and sentencing reform bill, which just received royal assent, we can now, ¹⁵Promise · 76 wordsas the Minister of Public Safety confirmed, go to the provinces and territories, have a PT meeting with the provinces and territories, ¹⁶and say that we need to act together to train police and prosecutors. We need specialized hate crime prosecutors across this country, to be named by the provinces. We need, most importantly, to have prosecutorial directives or other measures, where police are told by the provincial attorneys general how they should prosecute these crimes. Claims · 20 wordsIt should be consistent across this country. The passing of this flurry of justice bills is an opportunity for us. Procedure · 16 wordsI also want to address some of the misinformation I heard earlier today in the debate.Procedure Claims · 166 wordsFirst, one member talked about parents being worried about what they can say at the dinner table. Private discussions are not covered under the wilful promotion of hatred provisions under section 319 of the Criminal Code.¹⁷ To have members tell people that they have to worry about what they say at their dinner table is knowingly false. It is not true. Second, there were claims that the government would go out there and charge people, that somehow one minister’s comments would lead to a government that could go out and say that people should be charged. However, we live in a system where independent prosecutors, working with police, make these decisions. They are not influenced by what a government person tells them to do or not to do in any individual case. The only way for the government to have its view is prosecutorial directives that apply to an entire class of people, which would come from the provincial attorneys general, not the federal one usually. Positioning · 28 wordsI am kind of shocked to hear these claims that are so far out of reality that it diminishes what we are trying to do in the law.Positioning Procedure · 6 wordsFinally, let me be absolutely clear.Procedure Claims · 17 wordsWe also inserted a provision for greater clarity, to make clear that this is not the case, Reasoning · 19 wordsbut we should not have had to do that, because it is obvious that this is not the case.Unearned certainty Claims · 47 wordsPeople will not be charged because they read, quote or preach the Bible, the Quran, the Torah or any other holy book. This is entirely made up. It is negated by the Charter of Rights. It is negated by the “for greater certainty” provision in the bill.¹⁸ Positioning · 6 wordsThis is a really important bill.Positioning Claims · 24 wordsAs a member of the Jewish community who has felt this hate, I know that every major organization in my community supports this bill.¹⁹ Positioning · 27 wordsIt is a really important bill to get hate off our streets, to make sure criminals get off our streets and to make sure there is deterrence.Positioning The ask · 9 wordsI would call upon everyone to support this bill.