Analysis · Debate question · beta

Tamara Kronis

Conservative on Government Business No. 11—Proceedings on Bill C-26 2026-06-16

177 words · 9 sentences · 11 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 97 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 78%Reasoning 6%The ask 6%The question 11%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 138 wordsI have lost track of the number of times I have stood in the House in the last few days to talk about the government’s again ramming a bill through the House. In this case, the bill has not had the benefit of second reading, committee study, third reading or report stage.¹ It has not been to the Senate.² It has not had the benefit of being studied in either House.³ It concerns an extremely important area of policy and law in this country, and we have seen the unintended consequences of badly drafted Liberal bills being rammed through the House. We saw it with Bill C-3, wherein there are unintended consequences, including lots of Americans who are discovering their connections to Canada. We have seen it with the minister’s actions when he was the mayor of Vancouver.⁴ Reasoning · 10 wordsThis is an area that we have to get right, Vague promiseThe ask · 10 wordsand I would urge the government not to do this. The question · 19 wordsI would challenge the minister to explain why Canadians should not get the benefit of debate on the bill.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 91

1 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we have to get right”The speaker commits her side to getting the area right without naming any actor, measure, date or success condition.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the bill has not had the benefit of second reading, committee study, third reading or report stage.”Bill C-26 has not had second reading, committee study, third reading, or report stage.search
2“It has not been to the Senate.”Bill C-26 has not been to the Senate.search
3“It has not had the benefit of being studied in either House.”Bill C-26 has not been studied in either House.search
4“the minister’s actions when he was the mayor of Vancouver.”A minister took actions while serving as mayor of Vancouver.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20