Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Jeff Kibble

84 words · 7 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, I believe the member is wrong on so many counts. In one sense, he needs to realize that what we are talking about is $1.7 billion, working in collaboration with provincial and territorial jurisdictions, to increase Canada’s housing stock. The best example is the one that has already been negotiated in collaboration with the Premier of Ontario, which is a Progressive Conservative government. We have come to an agreement where we are going to have residents purchase new homes and save literally tens of thousands of dollars on each home. To deny that this would motivate more home constructions and more home ownership is denying reality. Why will the member not recognize reality?”
Statement grade
B
78 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 43%Claims 52%Procedure 5%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 17 wordsto be frank, I am absolutely not worried what the member opposite thinks, and neither are Canadians.PositioningOff pointUnearned certainty Claims · 22 wordsThere have been 11,000 homes built so far under a project for $13 billion that is looking for an extra $1.7 billion.1 Procedure · 4 wordsLet us be serious.Procedure Positioning · 5 wordsThere is absolutely no accountability.Positioning Claims · 22 wordsThe Prime Minister pledged 500,000 homes per year, 2and there were 260,000 starts last year.3 My math says we are short 240,000. Positioning · 14 wordsThat is what Canadians care about, not what the member opposite has to say.Positioning

Analysed on