Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Dan Muys

93 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Sébastien Lemire (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, the debate on Bill C-26 is a good time to take stock of what the new Liberal government has accomplished after a year in office, even though the Liberals have been in power for 10 years, as we all know. When it comes to housing, there has been talk of cutting spending and eliminating immediate affordability supports, such as the Canada housing benefit, and supports for existing social housing. Budget 2025 also indicates that spending will drop to just $4.3 billion in 2028-29, a 56% drop compared to the funding allocated for 2025-26. If housing were really a priority for the Liberal government, would it be making such drastic and predictable cuts over the coming years?”
Statement grade
A–
Average 89 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 5%Reasoning 57%Claims 38%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 5 wordsmy colleague’s point is valid.Procedure Reasoning · 30 wordsIt is not the spending, whether it is increasing or decreasing, and we have debated that, that is resulting in the construction of homes. We need builders to have confidence.Vague promise Claims · 35 wordsWe need an economy that is, as it was 11 years ago, the strongest-performing economy in the G7, the strongest-performing economy in the OECD, not the only economy in the G20 that is in recession.12 Reasoning · 23 wordsThat is what is going to help build homes and ensure that they are affordable for young Canadians to actually enter the market.Vague promise

Analysed on