← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity. Average 79 / 100
Signal
62 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
53 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 17% Procedure 6% Positioning 26% The ask 29% Reasoning 22%
Structure · 7 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 20 words to the point where they are making disruptive noises that interfere with the debate in the House, that is inappropriate. Procedure · 7 words Let me just conclude my comments here. Procedure Positioning · 28 words The government wants to ram this through. The Liberals want unanimous consent from all the parties to somehow magically just support them in whatever they want to do, Positioning The ask · 35 words but we actually want accountability. We want the government to deliver results for the people, for Canada, for Canadians who are struggling with the housing crisis, not just to hand over cheques without accountability measures. Positioning · 4 words That is the difference. Positioning Reasoning · 27 words The market will not fix the problem. What will fix the problem is a policy choice of investing in the people and for people ahead of profits. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×7 Positioning ×3 Procedure
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 62
4 of 11 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Let me just conclude my comments here.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The government wants to ram this through.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Liberals want unanimous consent from all the parties to somehow magically just support them in whatever they want to do,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is the difference.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 53
7 of 11 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The government wants to ram this through.” Returns to criticism of the government’s handling of the bill, not the noise point raised.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The Liberals want unanimous consent from all the parties to somehow magically just support them in whatever they want to do,” About the Liberals seeking unanimous consent on the bill, not the lobby noise raised.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “but we actually want accountability.” States her party’s demand for accountability on the bill, not the interjection’s point.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We want the government to deliver results for the people, for Canada, for Canadians who are struggling with the housing crisis, not just to hand over cheques without accountability measures.” About accountability measures for the bill’s payments, not the noise point.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That is the difference.” A summary line about her party’s position on the bill, not the interjection.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The market will not fix the problem.” A claim about the housing problem the bill addresses, not the point raised about noise.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “What will fix the problem is a policy choice of investing in the people and for people ahead of profits.” Her party’s policy approach to housing, not the noise point put to her.
Respect · 100
0 of 11 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 11 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
