← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity. Average 68 / 100
Signal
77 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
45 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
49 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 27% Reasoning 8% Positioning 65%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 29 words the people sleeping outside tonight cannot wait. The seniors choosing between food and medication cannot wait, and the constituents facing administrative collapse in a federal compensation program cannot wait. Reasoning · 9 words Budgets reveal values, and this bill reveals them clearly. Positioning · 70 words Canadians deserve an economy built on fairness, transparency and delivery, not on delay and indifference. They deserve a government that is willing to govern for all Canadians, not just for the hedge fund managers, the private equity CEOs and the finance bros who hang out at the Empire Club of Canada in downtown Toronto, such as the Prime Minister and his narrow circle of insiders. Mockery Everyday working Canadians deserve better. Positioning Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×8 Positioning ×2 Mockery Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate. Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “the finance bros who hang out at the Empire Club of Canada in downtown Toronto, such as the Prime Minister and his…”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 77
2 of 11 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Canadians deserve an economy built on fairness, transparency and delivery, not on delay and indifference.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Everyday working Canadians deserve better.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 45
8 of 11 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “the people sleeping outside tonight cannot wait.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The seniors choosing between food and medication cannot wait,” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and the constituents facing administrative collapse in a federal compensation program cannot wait.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Budgets reveal values,” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and this bill reveals them clearly.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Canadians deserve an economy built on fairness, transparency and delivery, not on delay and indifference.” A general statement of what Canadians deserve, not tied to the bill’s measures or the gaps raised.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “They deserve a government that is willing to govern for all Canadians, not just for the hedge fund managers, the private equity CEOs and the finance bros who hang out at the Empire Club of Canada in downtown Toronto, such as the Prime Minister and his narrow circle of insiders.” About whom the Prime Minister and his circle serve, not the bill’s measures or the gaps asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Everyday working Canadians deserve better.” A general closing claim that working Canadians deserve better, without addressing the bill or the gaps raised.
Respect · 49
1 of 11 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Mockery Mocking a person instead of answering their argument. What the tags mean → “the finance bros who hang out at the Empire Club of Canada in downtown Toronto, such as the Prime Minister and his narrow circle of insiders” The phrase ‘such as the Prime Minister’ makes an identifiable person the target of the ridicule and name-calling about who he supposedly hangs out with, rather than any criticism of his conduct or record.
Clarity · 100
0 of 11 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
