Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Rebecca Alty

105 words · 6 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Tako Van Popta (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, in Cowichan Tribes v. the Attorney General of Canada, the B.C. Supreme Court declared aboriginal title over private lands, and the private landowners, 150 of them, are worried. It has been well documented that the Liberals directed their federal lawyers to drop arguments protecting private property rights, to pull their punches and allow aboriginal title to take precedence. Where are the results for private landowners?”
Statement grade
A
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 82%Procedure 1%Promise 17%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 86 wordsit is an important question and one that is currently before the courts.Partly on point In the recent Wolastoqey decision, the Court of Appeal in New Brunswick, which is the highest court in the province, has refused leave to appeal.1 It found that aboriginal title cannot be declared over private property.2 On the other side of the country, in the Cowichan case, the B.C. judge found that they could coexist.3 We disagree with B.C.’s decision and are appealing it to maintain the clarity and certainty of private properties.4 Procedure · 1 wordsHowever, ProcedurePromise · 18 wordsas we are seeing differing views in the courts, we continue to be there to get the certainty.Vague promise

Analysed on