Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Michelle Rempel Garner

Conservative on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2026-06-18

95 words · 7 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

Average 93 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

The question 14%Claims 62%Positioning 17%The ask 7%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, The question · 13 wordsafter a year, how can she put that falsehood forward in the House? Claims · 59 wordsPeople are getting sweetheart sentences in order to avoid deportation. There is a story every week. Section 34 of a law that she maintains, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, requires them to be deported, ¹yet she voted against a law that would close a loophole that prevents people who have been convicted of serious crimes from being deported.² Positioning · 16 wordsWhy will she not stand up for people? Why will she not maintain an orderly system?Positioning The ask · 7 wordsShe should be closing this loophole now.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 78

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Why will she not stand up for people?”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Why will she not maintain an orderly system?”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Section 34 of a law that she maintains, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, requires them to be deported”Section 34 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act requires people convicted of serious crimes to be deported.search
2“she voted against a law that would close a loophole that prevents people who have been convicted of serious crimes from being deported”The minister Rempel Garner addresses voted against a law that would close a loophole preventing deportation of people convicted of serious crimes.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20