← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 77 / 100
Signal
80 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
50 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 39% Procedure 16% Claims 27% The question 19%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 29 words this member from northern Saskatchewan is the biggest embarrassment to come out of Saskatchewan since the Riders lost the Grey Cup for having too many men on the field. Mockery Procedure · 12 words Let me make a list of what this guy has actually delivered. Procedure Claims · 20 words He cancelled the Snowbirds.1 He shuttered two agriculture research stations.2 He never delivered money for the RCMP museum in Regina.3 The question · 14 words If the Liberal government is doing so great, why are Canadians struggling so much?
At a glance
Lost points for Mockery Procedure Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “the biggest embarrassment to come out of Saskatchewan since the Riders lost the Grey Cup for having too many men on the…”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 80
1 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Let me make a list of what this guy has actually delivered.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 50
1 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Mockery Mocking a person instead of answering their argument. What the tags mean → “the biggest embarrassment to come out of Saskatchewan since the Riders lost the Grey Cup for having too many men on the field” Ridicules the identified member personally with a mocking comparison rather than any act or position.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “He cancelled the Snowbirds.” The unnamed official cancelled the Snowbirds. search 2 “He shuttered two agriculture research stations.” The unnamed official shuttered two agriculture research stations. search 3 “He never delivered money for the RCMP museum in Regina.” The unnamed official never delivered money for the RCMP museum in Regina. search
