“Mr. Speaker, I do not think Saint Pierre and Miquelon was even mentioned in that answer. I do not think that answer is very good for the next generation or very comforting to the next generation. Critical minerals, for example, are critical to the country’s development and future. It seems that the Liberal government claims to spend millions of dollars in hard-to-reach places that require huge construction of roads, ports and highways. If these are national building projects, why does the government not invest in critical minerals in Newfoundland and Labrador, including in Port Hope Simpson, which is already at tidewater, already has highways and already has the infrastructure and everything needed to succeed?”
Statement grade
A–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 89. The grade is held to 86, 30 above Signal.
86 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 25%Claims 59%Aside 16%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 11 wordsthe hon. member talks about critical minerals.I have good news.ProcedureClaims · 26 wordsToday we found 13 new projects to invest in critical minerals, with $5 billion invested in Canada and in critical minerals from seven different allied countries.12Aside · 7 wordsMaybe they should watch the news sometime.Aside
