Analysis · Speech on a bill · beta

Marianne Dandurand

683 words · 42 sentences · 59 clauses

Statement grade
A+
Average 96 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Greeting 1%Procedure 4%Thanks 5%Claims 68%Anecdote 3%Reasoning 16%The ask 3%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Greeting · 10 wordsit is an honour to rise today after my colleagues, GreetingProcedure · 17 wordsand after speaking last month in the House, to conclude debate at second reading on Bill C‑268.1Procedure Thanks · 7 wordsI thank all my colleagues who spoke.Thanks Claims · 12 wordsI am pleased to see that this is not a partisan issue. Thanks · 25 wordsI want to thank the members for Tobique—Mactaquac, Joliette—Manawan, Egmont, Portage—Lisgar, London—Fanshawe, Brome—Missisquoi, Drummond, Avalon, Riding Mountain and Elgin—St. Thomas—London South for supporting the bill.Thanks Claims · 89 wordsMy colleague from Elgin—St. Thomas—London South was talking about people who live just outside urban centres and have no Internet connection. I live in a city with a population of nearly 200,000, 2and I do not get more than one bar of Internet signal inside my home. Members of Parliament from every region of the country and every party have described exactly the same reality: roads with no signal, underserved communities, and citizens who cannot rely on their phones when they need them. That is also my personal experience, Procedure · 4 wordsas I just mentioned.Procedure Claims · 98 wordsI am one of those people who has to move closer to a window to get better reception. On the roads in my region, I know exactly where I have to tell the person on the other end of the line that the connection is going to drop and that I will have to call them back in a minute. Sometimes it is even worse: I have to call back in 10 minutes. As the member for Portage—Lisgar pointed out, people have come to accept a level of service that would be considered unacceptable in any other sector. Procedure · 5 wordsHe gave the following example: ProcedureClaims · 68 wordsNo one would agree to buy a car that stops working as soon as they turn onto a certain road. In too many rural regions, people are paying full price for cell service that disappears once they reach a certain road or a certain village. My colleagues from Drummond and Brome—Missisquoi demonstrated what this is like by holding up their phones and pretending to search for a signal. Anecdote · 21 wordsWe all do that in the regions. We laughed about it because it is something that we do all the time.Anecdote Reasoning · 9 wordsHowever, behind such anecdotes lie much more serious concerns. Claims · 58 wordsMy colleagues talked about emergency services, first responders, accidents, serious health problems and women experiencing violence who cannot always rely on the network when they need it. The mayor of Martinville, Michel‑Henri Goyette, was the one who reminded me that this issue goes beyond cellphone call quality.3 He also reminded me that we should not settle for mediocrity. Reasoning · 23 wordsThat is why, as my colleague said, I have tackled this issue head-on. That is why I am bringing it before the House. Claims · 65 wordsIt is a matter of economic development, public safety and fairness for people in rural areas. The member for Egmont reminded us that poor connectivity limits access to telehealth, remote learning and new learning opportunities. The digital divide is becoming a social, economic and regional divide. We know where the dead zones are. Constituents know them; mayors know them; paramedics know them; firefighters know them. Reasoning · 21 wordsThe problem is not whether they exist. It is having the tools needed to map these areas and guide future decisions. Claims · 20 wordsBill C‑268 proposes two practical measures. First, it would require a process to verify the accuracy of wireless coverage data.4 Reasoning · 18 wordsIf we want to fix connectivity gaps, we need an accurate picture of where those gaps actually exist. Claims · 21 wordsSecond, it would modernize Canada’s spectrum policy framework, 5which has not been updated since 2007.6 Technology has changed immensely since then, Reasoning · 41 wordsand our policy framework must evolve as well. We do not agree on everything, but there is something we seem to agree on: Doing nothing is not an option. The bill would not be the finish line, but a starting point. Claims · 31 wordsThe bill would get the ball rolling. It would create a better understanding of the problem, and ensure that rural connectivity is considered as a priority in future spectrum policy decisions. The ask · 20 wordsI urge all members to support Bill C‑268 at second reading and to refer it to committee for further consideration.

Analysed on