Analysis · Reply to a comment · beta

Rhonda Kirkland

59 words · 3 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Kevin Waugh (Conservative)
“Madam Speaker, one year in, the member for Oshawa has done a lot of work on the public safety committee. I just want to state again, on our amendment, that we agree with the government on part 1, which would be Bill C-22A. We have also heard from police all over this country that they need the tools. However, the privacy issue is what we are debating here tonight. Bill C-22B would be on the privacy issue. I sit on the heritage committee, and we had the same thing with the government this week when it threw up Bill C-34. That is also a privacy issue we are going to have to deal with when it comes back in the fall. To the hon. member for Oshawa, let us talk about part 2, because that is the hill we are going to die on. We need this amendment tonight for Bill C-22B.”
Statement grade
–
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 36%Positioning 64%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Thanks · 21 wordsI appreciate that very much, because that is exactly the kind of collaboration that is the correct collaboration in the House.Thanks Positioning · 38 wordsThe Liberals’ version of collaboration, with all due respect, is that we should say, “Yes, yes” to everything they say, without any debate and without any scrutiny, and say, “Please, just do whatever you want.” That is unacceptable.Positioning

Analysed on