“Mr. Speaker, I can appreciate that the member is trying to appeal to all members in the strongest way he can. However, the reality is that the government is listening to survivors. The government’s actions reinforce reports that have been brought forward. We can talk about the Justice Arbour report. He seemed to be offended that it is the report we reference. In June 2024, the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, which has representation from the Bloc, the Conservatives and the Liberals, recommended the same thing. I would appeal to the Conservatives to listen to all of the victims, like Justice Arbour did, both in confidence and out of confidence. She came up with the recommendation for a reason. Maybe the member could tell us why it is that Conservatives voted—”
Statement grade
B+
The average of Signal, Relevance and Clarity.
Average 82 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 79%Positioning 21%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 57 wordsagain, the Arbour report did not look at what is in Bill C-11, 1which simply would leave the majority of sexual assault cases undealt with, unreported and unactioned.It is not even in Bill C-11.Therefore, regardless of what the Arbour report says or all of the other reports, the majority of victims and reports support choice.Unearned certaintyPositioning · 13 wordsBill C-11 and the Liberal Party would fail our military in the future.PositioningClaims · 15 wordsAs I directly pointed out, the majority of cases would go unresolved, unreported and unactioned, Positioning · 6 wordsand that is an embarrassing failure.Positioning
