← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance and Clarity is 62. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance. 30 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
85 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 13% Claims 52% The ask 35%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 words I rise on a point of order. Procedure Claims · 28 words I believe the member said we had a known prime minister who was a groper. It is highly inappropriate and definitely unparliamentary to make assertions of that nature, The ask · 19 words and I would ask that you have the member either apologize or retract the comment, at the very least. Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×3 Procedure Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 85
1 of 4 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I rise on a point of order.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 0
3 of 4 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I believe the member said we had a known prime minister who was a groper.” Raises the member’s language as unparliamentary rather than addressing the point about the bill or the question.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is highly inappropriate and definitely unparliamentary to make assertions of that nature,” Offers a procedural objection about conduct instead of engaging with the debate point or the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and I would ask that you have the member either apologize or retract the comment, at the very least.” Requests retraction or apology, a procedural remedy unrelated to the bill or the question asked.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
